Sliding vs Deciding: Scott Stanley's Blog: 2022

Friday, October 28, 2022

News Article Updating Progress on Government Funded Relationship Education Programs

If you are interested in the relationship education field, you may like reading this timely update at: DeseretNews

Monday, July 4, 2022

Are you letting fears about the future damage your future?

Here’s a post of mine you may find interesting.

“SkyFall”: How Fears About the Future Limit the Life we Live

Wednesday, January 12, 2022

Webinar for Dibble Institute: Recording now available

I did a webinar for the Dibble Institute on January 12, 2020. It is available online:

https://www.dibbleinstitute.org/event/webinar-sliding-vs-deciding-commitment-ambiguity-and-relationship-formation/

I also wrote detailed responses to questions asked during the webinar that were not covered during it. That is available here:

https://www.dibbleinstitute.org/wp-new/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Stanley-Q-A-Dibble-Webinar.pdf

Below, I have placed links to a bunch of posts on themes covered in the webinar.

A 2018 post on trends in cohabitation based on new data from the CDC released at that time.

https://slidingvsdeciding.blogspot.com/2018/07/cohabitation-is-common-update-on-trends.html

An overview of the inertia hypothesis and why living together before marriage may not provide the benefits that most people expect.

http://slidingvsdeciding.blogspot.com/2014/07/the-mystery-why-isnt-living-together.html

A post reviewing the inertia theory with scores of links related to the idea that cohabitation increases inertia, which, for some couples, makes it harder to leave before they had worked out a commitment to the future together.

https://slidingvsdeciding.blogspot.com/2018/03/citations-for-tests-of-inertia_26.html

A fun, engaging video from the team at PREP on inertia.

On YouTube: Relationship DUI

https://youtu.be/yPOSG5l_bY4

Two articles on the research by Rosenfeld and Roesler that shook up the assumption that cohabitation before marriage no longer leads to increased risk in marriage.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/premarital-cohabitation-is-still-associated-with-greater-odds-of-divorce

https://ifstudies.org/blog/is-cohabitation-still-linked-to-greater-odds-of-divorce

dMotivated Ambiguity: Is this a date or not?

http://slidingvsdeciding.blogspot.com/2014/01/motivated-ambiguity.html

Weak and Strong Links: Asymmetrical Commitment in Unmarried Relationships

https://ifstudies.org/blog/weak-and-strong-links-asymmetrical-commitment-in-unmarried-relationships

Links to papers and articles related to asymmetrical commitment

https://slidingvsdeciding.blogspot.com/2019/01/some-links-about-asymmetrical-commitment.html

You can lower your risk of divorce. Advice to singles

http://slidingvsdeciding.blogspot.com/2015/03/you-can-lower-your-risk-of-divorce.html

Searching for "The One": Mate Selection in this Modern World

http://slidingvsdeciding.blogspot.com/2016/05/searching-for-one-mate-selection-in.html

Attachment and the Perfect Storm. A piece speculating about the difficulties for forming attachment in an ambiguous relationship world.

http://slidingvsdeciding.blogspot.com/2012/03/attachment-and-perfect-storm.html

Why Sliding vs. Deciding?

Sliding vs. Deciding is a theme that comes out of my study of commitment and my work with my major colleague in this area, Galena Rhoades, and the work of other scholars on how couples go through important relationship transitions. I believe “sliding vs. deciding” captures something important about how romantic relationships develop. The core idea is that people often slide through important transitions in relationships rather than deciding what they are doing and what it means, especially regarding commitment. An important paper by Wendy Manning and Pamela Smock (2005) was influential in our thinking about how couples transitioned into living together. They conducted a qualitative study of cohabiting couples and found that over one half of couples who are living together didn’t talk about it or make any decision, but simply slid into doing so. Another paper having a large influence on this thinking was written by Jo Lindsey (2000). She found that the cohabiting couples she interviewed could not articulate how they came to be living together. In fact, as she puts it, it seemed like they had no agency in how it happened. Lindsay concluded that the fundamental characteristic of cohabitation was ambiguity, a theme we often discuss. Manning and Smock, Lindsay, and other researchers have noted that, for most couples, moving in together was nothing like a clear decision about what the couple was doing. Thus, it very often is not anything like a how people form a clear commitment. In one of our quantitative studies of cohabitation, we have found that most cohabiters report a process more like sliding into cohabitation than talking about it and making a decision about it.

We believe this sliding vs. deciding dynamic which is quite obvious in how couples come to live together is common in many important relationship transitions, including pregnancy, having children, work, as well as in how couples drift into regular patterns of who does what. In contrast to sliding, commitments that we are most likely to follow through on are based in decisions. In fact, commitment is making a choice to give up other choices. A commitment is a decision. Do we always need to be making a decision about things? I hope not. But when something important in life is at stake, I believe that deciding will trump sliding in how things turn out.

One of the most important implications of the concept of sliding vs. deciding is when this theme is married to our work and thought on the depths of ambiguity in relationship formation these days and our ideas about inertia. What people are often now seeing is that they are sliding through relationship transitions that cause them to increase constraints and lose options before (or without) noticing that they have just entered a more constrained pathway. As a result, we believe that many people are too often giving up options before they have made a choice. That is far from making a choice to give up other choices. That's losing options because one is not noticing an important, or even potentially high cost slide, is not what solid commitment formation is about.

Three theory papers written by me and Galena Rhoades are accessible above at the links: "Sliding vs. Deciding: Inertia and the Premarital Cohabitation Effect", "Commitment: Functions, Formation, and the Securing of Romantic Attachment," and the link labeled "SvD Transition and Risk Model."

Sliding vs Deciding: Scott Stanley's Blog